People rarely bring me
the actual problem.They bring a symptom.

A metric that won't move. An onboarding experience nobody adopts. A design system that isn't being used. A product team with too many opinions and no shared direction.

The symptom is real. But where it shows up is rarely where the solution lives.

My work is helping organizations step back far enough to see the whole system: the people, incentives, workflows, decisions, and constraints that shape the experience. Sometimes that means understanding customers. Sometimes it means understanding teams. Most often, it means connecting the two.

Across advertising, banking, loyalty, enterprise software, and AI learning tools, I've helped teams move from one-off fixes to a clearer view of the whole, and from a pile of data to a real sense of what to do next.

How I work

Research capacity is not fixed

I am the only researcher supporting a fast-growing advertising business across both its B2B and B2C product areas. Demand arrived faster than one person could run studies for it, the tooling under a key measurement initiative was discontinued mid-year, and there was no shared standard for how findings were framed.

I did not answer any of that by working more hours. I built the infrastructure that lets a practice absorb more scope than the person running it.

Read how I work →
01Triage before capacity. Two tracks, so the depth a request gets is a decision rather than an accident of arrival order.
02Feedback becomes a standard. Every review note turned into a standing guideline instead of a one-off correction.
03Tooling built for this business. An AI-assisted synthesis workflow encoding those guidelines, so consistency stops depending on my available attention.
04Nobody asked. No mandate to build process. I found the bottleneck, built the response, then socialized it as the standard.

Selected work

Four case studies
Ad tech · Full lifecycle

A manual reporting bottleneck became

insights at the speed of a deal.

Reports that meant days of waiting on the data team became something sellers and CSMs pull themselves in minutes. Foundational research done a year before the feature existed became the evidence behind its design, and a mental-model finding changed the data architecture rather than the screens.

41 sessions One year Qual + behavioral analytics
Design systems · Service design

A design system adoption problem became

a human system, not a component problem.

The team thought they needed a better portal. Research showed the real problem was adoption. Three behavioral mindsets explained why job title never predicted who adopted, and the work moved from fixing screens to designing onboarding, contribution, support, and governance around how people actually build.

38 interviews 3 mindsets Future-state service map
Ethnography · Audience strategy

Twenty-four living rooms became

six audiences a media plan could buy.

A spirits portfolio had no formal segmentation and a customer database too small to build one. A longitudinal diary study explained why people buy. A quantitative pass said how many of them there are. Crossing personas with need states turned audience portraits into a targeting brief.

~300 screened 24 participants Diary study + sizing
Mixed methods · Experimentation

A conversion drop-off became

a repeatable optimization system.

A lead form was losing people and analytics could not say why. I built the loop: usability evidence became testable hypotheses, experiments validated them in production, and results fed back into what to research next. The rebuilt form lifted lead conversion 6%, and 20% on desktop at 99.98% confidence.

+6% conversion +20% desktop A/B validated

The work I'm most proud of doesn't end with insights. It changes how organizations make decisions.

Better understanding isn't the goal.Better decisions are.